Let's get Social

Subscribe to get marketing updates right to your inbox!

Your email:


learning seo from the experts  


inbound marketing benchmarks


Inbound Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

9 SEO Tricks That Are SO 2010


Is Your SEO Stuck in the Past?

seo tricksIf SEO were human, it would be approaching its 13th birthday. It's amazing to reflect on how the best practices for optimization have changed over the years. Marketers and bloggers who focus on delivering high-quality content year after year don’t need to fear any future updates to the Google search algorithm. If you’re still spinning articles or posting on forums asking for reciprocal link exchanges, you could be asking for some negative SEO. We’ve curated a list of Pre-Panda tricks and tips that just aren’t what they used to be:

1. Useless Press Releases

If you don’t have anything nice or constructive to say, don’t say anything at all. Unless your company has achieved something or made a difference, don’t spam reporters with pointless press releases just to build a link or two.

2. Deliberate Link Exchanges

Sorry, search engines are going to be on to you pretty quickly if your idea of good SEO begins and ends with a pre-meditated link exchange. There are very few shortcuts to positive SEO, and exchanging emails with other websites can get you caught pretty quickly. If you want to engage in controlled link building, email your peers and offer a well-written guest post. Open up opportunities to others and create good link karma by citing authoritative sources in your content and accepting guest posts from others.

3. Lazy Content Creation

Just showing up on your blog day after day isn’t enough to build an engaged audience, drive leads or become recognized by Google, Bing, and Yahoo search as someone worth ranking. Here are a few ways to tell if you’re taking a Pre-Panda approach to content creation:

  • Are you outsourcing content creation? Outsourcing isn’t always a bad thing. But your readers can tell the difference between content that’s written by an expert and blog articles that cost $4.00.

  • Are you writing for Google? If you’re writing for the sole purpose of optimizing around a keyword, there’s a good chance no one’s reading it or giving you the social media shares that are critical to SEO in 2013.

  • Do you fill your content calendar with fresh ideas and hot topics? If your idea of blogging is sitting down and putting something you’ve written hundreds of times before in a slightly different tone of voice, your blog is probably pretty boring.

4. Ignoring Blog Analytics

Keyword research still matters, but your inbound marketing analytics are the best way to tell what’s working for your buyer personas. Your blog will earn clicks and contribute to your bottom line positively if, and only if, you’re using CTA click-throughs, social media shares, and inbound links as a tool for improvement.

5. Focusing Solely on Search Rankings

I’m going to be honest here and say that our blog would be genuinely awful if we solely blogged for search rankings and used keywords as the primary tool for content creation. While it might improve our organic search rankings, we’d probably find that our leads and social media traffic would suffer more. Don’t just consider keywords as a tool for ranking, but research whether anyone is searching for the term and how website visitors behave once they click through. If you’re ranked #1 for “free kittens,” but your company specializes in pool liners, it’s probably nothing to be proud of.

6. Abusing Tags

Back when many of IMA’s employees were in middle school, keyword tags were a legitimate way to rank for search terms. If you were writing about “marketing in Nashville,” filling your tags with 3,000 variations of this term and others was an effective way to soar to the top of Google. The problem was, search engines caught on really quickly. Not only are your tags ignored by major search, they’re primarily a function of user experience. Your website’s bounce rate will probably soar if people don’t have the patience to look through your archives.

7. Aggressively Utilizing Keyword Density

With the exception of maybe a few black hat SEOs, no one was sad to see aggressive keyword density get added to the list of things that can get website owners hit with negative SEO. A few years ago, many search experts routinely recommended striving for an average density of 4-7%. This tactic typically resulted in repetitive and unnatural language.

Write amazing content using a varied vocabulary. Don’t worry about aggressively using the keyword throughout the content body. If you’re staying on topic, your keyword may turn up every other paragraph or so.

8. Exact Match Domains

Website URLs used to weigh heavily on search results, a phenomenon known as “exact match domains.” If you were searching for “cheap heels for women,” there was a pretty good chance one of the top results would be something like cheapheelsforwomen.com. You can thank marketers once again for ruining this phenomenon again: it was all too easy to purchase domains comprised of a longtail keyword, fill them with a few paragraphs of low-quality content and copious advertisements. As of September 29, 2012, exact match is no longer a major factor in your sites search ranking. Make sure your URL represents who you are, and stop dumping your marketing budget into new and obscure URLs from GoDaddy.

9. Content Spinning

Quantity used to matter to an SEO strategy, a factor which resulted in a terrible practice known as “spinning content.” Using cheap outsourcing websites or online tools, SEOs could simply copy and paste content into a spinning tool and receive back hundreds of very similar articles that just barely escaped most technical definitions of plagiarism. Most of the time, it was unreadable. Search engines have gotten much better at identifying structural similarities that indicate content’s not adding anything of value, and even identifying whether content reads naturally.

Which Old-Fashioned SEO Tactics Has Your Company Stopped Using?

 image credit: thaikrit/freedigitalphotos.net


Amen. It's time that someone wrote about these issues. These things are happening often, and I'm happy to see someone finally address them.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 30, 2013 7:48 AM by John Kreiss
Tend to agree with all the points raised but with a couple of reservations.  
Wouldn't want to be too proscriptive particularly about points 1 & 8. 
Not disagreeing with point one but would stress the operative consideration is the term 'useless'. If you do have a 'good' news or 'good news' story and it's relevant to either your business, or the public in general, submitting a press release is still a worthwhile marketing option. 
There has been some considerable discussion surrounding EMDs with should I, shouldn't I get one. The problem with EMDs is, apart from being abused, is that good, descriptive and relevant ones are just too difficult to find having all been snapped up in the past, often for the wrong reason. 
However, and with some agreement in a recent LinkedIn discussion, was that if you can find one it won't do your site any harm. 
If used appropriately eg redwidgets.com would still be highly attractive if the site was specifically and informative and all about red widgets.  
Rightly or wrongly, if almost any search is done, an EMD site will likely be ranked and hopefully for justified reasons. In many cases even if other sites are better, properly and legitimately optimised following accepted good practice, the EMD ranks higher. 
Even after recent Google updates EMDs still appear to be allotted a slightly higher weighting.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:23 AM by Rob Willox
Interesting feedback, Rob! Thanks for sharing that insight on EMDs - I'm about to go do some more research on the topic.  
And thank you so much for the kind words, John!
Posted @ Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8:34 AM by Jasmine Henry
Great Article and Great suggestions. I will be recommending this article. Thank you!! 
I bookmarked the post for the inspirational future activities :D
Posted @ Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:02 AM by vamsi krishna
Thank you, Vamsi! I'm glad to hear I could assist with your content creation process.
Posted @ Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:40 AM by Jasmine Henry
Thank you, Usman! I'm happy you liked the psot.
Posted @ Saturday, March 30, 2013 10:18 AM by Jasmine Henry
Post Comment
Website (optional)

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics